Ahmet Hakan: Isn’t it a crime when they murder with tanks or machine guns?
ucgen

Ahmet Hakan: Isn’t it a crime when they murder with tanks or machine guns?

1877
What He Said?What Happened?

A9 TV: May 1st, 2013

ADNAN OKTAR: Now isn’t that weird? They brutally murder Muslims. They execute then by shooting  them with machine guns, they blow them to  pieces by bombs, they spray bombs. They spray bullets into the buildings, into the people. They see these as normal. But when it comes to killing with a chemical weapon they say “Oh, this is not humane.” Is it more humane to blow someone up with a  bomb? The man is in agony  on the ground, his bones fractured, they smash his face in, his arms and legs chopped off. Is it more humane? Don’t they like the way of killing? Is it a better way of killing? Because it is a better way of killing, they just watch and don’t find it necessary to intervene. But if they kill in a different way, then they “cannot tolerate” this.  That makes absolutely no sense. No matter how it is done, savagery is terrible. In the end it is  murder, no matter if they are killed by chemical weapons or in a different way and humanity should respond to this murder immediately. These problems,  in the Middle East and all around the world, can only be solved  with the Turkish Islamic Union. So Islamic Union should be established presently.


August 29th, 2013: A9 TV

ADNAN OKTAR: They are fixated on chemical weapons. They burn the people with  napalm bombs and say ”This is very normal”. The kids are blazing. The napalm bomb burns down everything. It sweeps away the whole neighborhood. They say “This is legal”. They spray bombs with a purpose, they change the geography of the region, they change the very form of the land, it becomes a valley. And they say “This is very normal too.” The shrapnel pieces scratch somebody’s face off  and tear the other’s arm off. They say; “These are normal”. But for the chemical weapon they say:”How can it be? It is not humane.” “How can they murder like that? They must murder like this”, they say. “This way is more polite” they say. This is not a logical statement. There must not be any murders like this, all of them are the same. Murdering people with  chemical weapons is the same as murdering with a conventional   bombs, it is the same as murdering people with  a machine gun. Syria is in  trouble as a result of Darwinism and materialism. There is a communist government in Syria. The communist government is Darwinist and materialist.


August 31st, 2013: A9 TV

ADNAN OKTAR: Ok, so you sprayed bombs. “We have made such a huge mistake, we will never do such thing again.” Will those men say this? “But if you don’t like killing like this, we can kill in a more suitable way then”, they would say. “We can murder people by smothering them, murder by burning, murder by cutting them into pieces. So we can cut people into pieces with a saw. He sees murdering with a saw more logical. They make the people stand by the wall, and stab at them, one by one. And they say that this is normal, because there is a war. But when it comes to chemical weapon, they say “They killed with gas, how cruel!”They kill the people by hitting them in their heads with wood, and they find it normal again. They pour gasoline on their faces, and they burn their heads, but they again find it normal, because it is war. But they say; “They used gas, this is a very big thing”. “And let us bomb you and you would come to your senses”. But nothing would happen. You are only forbitting one type of murder among thousands of ways, and encouraging them to kill in a thousand different ways; you are saying, I disapprove of one type of murder. I couldn’t understand the logic here. All of them are savageness. They spray bombs into their faces, they spray bombs onto their heads, onto their bodies, the shrapnel pieces cut deeply, and they are in agony, but they say that it is very normal. This is what war is, they say. It is obvious that there would be no deductions, they are wasting their money. They are running in circles and they are vainly hurting people.  Mahdi is the only solution.

 

Hürriyet: September 12th , 2013


In his column, Ahmet Hakan wrote about the massacre in Syria; “ I would like to ask:  to interfere, does a massacre have to be done by using chemical weapons? Isn’t there a problem, when Assad slaughters with tanks and machine guns? Isn’t it a crime when the dissidents throw a man down from the roof? 

SHARE
logo
logo
logo
logo
logo