Evolutionist Despotism in the United States
Harun Yahya
We have referred to the existence of a Darwinist dictatorship that rules the world, acts over and above all laws almost everywhere and that is protected under the law many times before. This is a tyrannical dictatorship, the religion of Darwinism that is totally constructed on deception, that is maintained by no scientific evidence and that therefore imposes Darwinism on mankind by way of despotism, compulsion and pressure. This despotic system tries all means to protect Darwinism and prevent anti-Darwinist activities, and recognizes no bounds as it does so. And this dictatorship is currently propped up by laws, supported by political rulers and kept on the agenda by the best-known TV channels, papers and journals, especially in Europe and America.
America has been the scene of one of the most despotic practices of this despotic dictatorship for some time now. Various Darwinist organizations have brought LEGAL PROCEEDINGS against public schools in America in order to prevent the teaching of Creation.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the National Center of Science Education (NCSE) that also acts on behalf of Darwinism, are now acting together in this area. The ACLU first brought legal proceedings to make the theory of evolution part of the curriculum in America in 1925 and, winning the case, initiated a period when the deception of evolution was taught in schools. It is now an organization trying to prevent the teaching of anything but evolution. The organization claims to stand up for “freedom of ideas,” for which purpose it supports the presence of heretical publications in school libraries and encourages perverted behavior among students. What it generally does in espousing freedom of ideas and encouraging perversion among young people is to seek to hinder all anti-evolutionary activities, to forbid students organizing religious meetings or activities and essentially to try to prevent the discussion of the fact of Creation in schools. In order to do that, the organization responds to schools that wish to include Creation in the curriculum by bringing legal proceedings against them.
The ACLU sued schools in the city of Cobb in the state of Georgia for putting warning stickers on text books saying they should think about evolution “with an open mind, by examining it carefully and critically.”
People representing the Americans United for Separation of Church and State organization in Lebec, California, brought legal proceedings against schools for even proposing selectivity on the subject of evolution and Creation.
A small group in Dover, Pennsylvania, supported by the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State opened a legal suit in order to prevent the discussion of Creation in 9th year biology classes. The judge ruled in their favor, and the school has been told to pay compensation to the plaintiff. That sum is likely to EXCEED ONE MILLION DOLLARS.1
This million-dollar fine was imposed under pressure from the Darwinist dictatorship, literally as a warning to others. Indeed, this repressive policy of the Darwinist dictatorship has borne fruit, and state schools with already limited budgets have become unable to defend their real views. In other words, Darwinism is kept alive by pressure and intimidation rather than by any scientific evidence.
The writer Ann Coulter offers this analysis;
After Dover, no school district will dare breathe a word about “creationism”, unless they want to risk being bankrupted by ACLU lawsuits. The Darwinists have saved the secular sanctity of their temples: the public schools. They didn’t win on science, persuasion, or the evidence. They won the way liberals always win: by finding a court to hand them everything they want on a silver platter.
This isn’t science…2
Instances are by no means restricted to these. When the principal of a high school in Detroit wished to place various books critical of Darwinism in the library in 1999, the NCSE fiercely opposed the move, using all kinds of intimidation.3
Jonathan Wells describes this policy of intimidation thus:
The NCSE tells school boards that “evolution isn’t scientifically controversial,” so “arguments against evolution” are “code words for attempt to bring non-scientific, religious views into the science curriculum.” Since U.S. courts have declared it unconstitutional to teach religion in public schools, this amounts to a warning that the school board is contemplating something illegal. If the warning doesn’t work, the NCSE calls on the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for backup, and the ACLU sends a letter to the school board threatening an expensive lawsuit. Since every school district in the country is already struggling to make ends meet, this bullying by the NCSE and ACLU has been quite successul in blocking overt critisizm of Darwinian evolution in public school classrooms.4
Jonathan Wells also states that despite this intense pressure from the Darwinist dictatorship in America, an increasing number of scientists are beginning to harbor doubts about Darwinism and to take steps to make their voices heard:
The truth is that a surprising number of biologists quietly doubt or reject some of the grander claims of Darwinian evolution. But – at least in America – they must keep their months shut or risk condemnation, marginalization, and eventual expulsion from the scientific community. This happens infrequently, but often enough to remind everyone that the risk is real. Even so, there is a growing underground of biologists who are in disenchanted with the Darwinists’ censorship of opposing viewpoints. When isolated dissidents begin to realize how many of their colleagues feel the same way, more and more of them will begin to speak out.5
Darwinists’ worst error is to fail to appreciate the might of Allah. The despotic and fascist methods they use are an indication of that fact. They believe they can keep Darwinism alive so long as they obstruct the teaching of the fact of Creation in schools and forcibly silence people who make anti-Darwinist statements. The fact is, however, that there is no need for comprehensive anti-Darwinist education to see that Darwinism is a deception. Even just a few of the illustrations of fossils in the Atlas of Creation that show they have never changed over the course of millions of years have sufficed to convince people, and the truth of the matter is that all the 250 million fossils so far unearthed corroborate the fact of Creation. Even just the realization that not a single protein can form by chance clearly declares the fact of Creation. Just one mention of the fact that not a single transitional fossil has ever been unearthed has been sufficient to demolish this heretical theory. Darwinism is constructed on such rotten foundations that even the smallest blow has demolished this huge deception. The increasing number of scientists who realize that Darwinism is a deception and the fact that people are turning to belief in Allah in huge numbers, despite all the intensive activities of the Darwinist dictatorship, is one of the greatest proofs of this. Allah reveals in a verse how He will always do away with superstition:
He sends down water from the sky and river-beds fill up and flow according to their size, and the floodwater carries with it an increasing layer of scum; a similar kind of scum comes from what you heat up in the fire, when you desire to make jewelry or other things. That is how Allah depicts the true and the false. As for the scum, it is quickly swept away. But as for that which is of use to people, it remains behind in the ground. That is a metaphor which Allah has made. (Surat Ar-Ra‘d, 17)
1. Ann Coulter, Godless The Church of Liberalism, Crown Forum Publishing, 2006, p. 200
2. Ann Coulter, Godless The Church of Liberalism, Crown Forum Publishing, 2006, p. 200
3. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution “Science of Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong?”, Regnery Publishing Inc., 2000, p. 237
4. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution“Science of Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong?”, Regnery Publishing Inc., 2000, p. 237
5. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, “Science of Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution Is Wrong?”, Regnery Publishing Inc., 2000, p. 239
