Chapter 2: What Darwinists Fail To Consider - 3/3

Darwinists Never Realize That the Stone Age is a Lie

These buttons made from bone and dating back to around 10,000 BC show that the people of the time had a clothing culture. But Darwinists refuse to admit that such a superior culture ever existed.

Evolutionists maintain that in the period between 11,000 and 7,000 BC human beings had only just adopted a settled mode of life and became civilized. The fact is, however, that tools from that time prove the existence of a flawless culture and civilization. The evidence for these societies that made use of technology for a settled lifestyle, knew about medicine and art and were highly civilized totally refutes Darwinists' claims.

Darwinists never acknowledge that at the very time when they claim that "primitive humans" were alive, there is proof that the people of the time actually enjoyed a civilization not so very different from our own. They used forks and spoons, welcomed guests, and led regular, settled lives.

This necklace, made from stones and shells and dating back to the Late Neolithic, shows that such concepts as art, aesthetics and technology existed at that time. But Darwinists do not think about what these findings tell us.

Darwinists never consider that buttons carved out of bone used circa 10,000 BCE are evidence that the people of that time wore sophisticated clothing culture, and that any culture that employed buttons must also have known about sewing and weaving.

Darwinists never consider how a 95,000-year-old flute is proof that people living tens of thousands of years ago appreciated music, and that there is no such thing as primitive man

Darwinists never consider how people of circa 10,000 BCE used copper implements, indicating that therefore, their society must have known about smelting and have had the technical know-how to extract copper from rock and then work it.

Darwinists never consider how the smooth finish on the surface of stones—from what they describe as from the Stone Age and claim to be the products of a primitive culture—is not the result of polish, because polish cannot survive intact for thousands of years. This patina was produced by using steel tools on the surface of the rock—a task requiring great skill.

Darwinists never question how a metal bowl was crafted from an alloy of zinc and silver 100,000 years ago, as reported in Scientific American magazine in 1852. The bouquets of flowers, bunches of grapes and other designs on it are the product of an advanced artistry. Clearly, the people who produced that alloy had developed a culture capable of working metal.

These stones, dating back to around 10,000 BC, were used as a kind of bead. Darwinists never think that the perfect holes in the stones could never have been made by smashing one against another, or of the fact that a technology employing iron and steel were used.

These 95,000-year-old whistles show that people at that time had a highly developed sense of music. To put in another way, the idea of the Stone Age is a Darwinist deception.

Darwinists never consider that a temperature of 1,084.5oC is needed to extract molten metal turn copper ore, that bellows or some other device is essential to ensure a flow of air during that process. A kiln must be constructed to maintain such a temperature, and that tools such as ladles and tongs to extract the metal from the kiln must also be in existence. For these reasons, people who lived in the past can in no way be regarded as primitive. (Also see Harun Yahya, A Historical Lie: The Stone Age, Istanbul: Global Publishing, 2006.)

These pins and awl are evidence that the imaginary time known as the Stone Age never happened. But this fact is ignored by Darwinists.

Darwinists never consider how countless discoveries, such as the remains of a metal bowl dating back 100,000 years, metal objects dating back 2,8 billion years, an iron bowl estimated to be 300 million years old, fragments of textiles dating back 27,000 years—plus metal remains showing that people in Europe were melting such metals as magnesium and platinum thousands of years ago—have entirely discredited the evolutionist deception of primeval peoples.

Darwinists never acknowledge how many discoveries belonging to ancient humans have been ignored by evolutionist scientists or else concealed in museum basements. The public has been given histories of early human societies that are entirely the product of evolutionists' imaginations, rather than the true history of mankind.

Darwinists never consider how the performance of brain surgery during the time they refer to as the Stone Age, and the discovery of adornments and the raw materials for dyes from excavations dating back to a time when they claim that human beings had no knowledge of art, are important evidence that there has never been a "primitive" time in human history.

Left: The bracelets above date back to around 9000-8500 BC; the one on the left is made of marble, and that on the right from basalt. In order for such extremely hard substances as basalt and marble to be made into smooth, round coils, sharp, shaping tools made from steel have to be used. Therefore, these objects from a time when Darwinists claim only stone tools were being used, refute all their claims. Right: A hammer head from 10,000 BC

Darwinists never consider how archaeological findings have revealed that human beings have possessed a cultural understanding since the day they first came into being. Periodic advances, retreats and abrupt changes in that understanding are possible, but do not mean that any evolutionary process ever took place. Instead, they represent evidence of cultural development and change.

Darwinists never consider how the archaeological remains left behind by the people of the past are inconsistent with the anatomical and biological remains that evolutionists maintain should exist—and that this once again totally discredits Darwinist claims on the subject.

The picture shows tools made from obsidian (a kind of volcanic glass) or bone, hooks, and various objects made from stone. These findings indicate that civilized human beings using technology were alive at this time. And this entirely eliminates the myth of evolution.       Nail-shaped filling stone dating back to around 10,000 BC

Darwinists Never Consider the Existence of the Soul

A tyrannical current born of Naturalist and Materialist philosophy will gradually become strong and spread at the end of time by means of materialist philosophy, reaching such a degree that it denies Allah. 40 Bediuzzaman Said Nursi

Darwinists never realize that throughout their whole lives, they can perceive only the images established by electrical currents in their brains. They can never directly experience the external origins of any image.

Throughout their lives, human beings are faced with images produced by electric currents in the brain. Their partners, homes, cars and everything they see are a collection of images, but we can never have any direct contact with their originals on the outside. Darwinists have no answer to the question “Who is it who does the perceiving?”

Darwinists never realize that the sounds they hear, the sights they see and the scents they smell are merely a totality of perceptions formed in their brains, and that they can never prove the material existence of any of them.

Darwinists never realize that they have no answer to the question of "Who is it who perceives the outside world?"

The interior of the brain is pitch black. But we see a vivid, brightly colored world within our brains. Darwinists are reluctant to think about the fact that we live in an image that the soul that perceives, takes pleasure and rejoices in.

Darwinists never realize that the high-quality sound they perceive inside their brains consists merely of electrical signals, and that their transmission can never be accounted for in terms of chance.

Darwinists never realize that materialism cannot explain what does the perceiving in the human mind, and cannot account for the superior "awareness" of mankind.

Darwinists never appreciate that the human brain—the most complex structure in the world and which they imagine to have been brought about by chance—presents to us a perfectly clear and vivid world, and that this sublime mechanism cannot be replicated by unconscious atoms in any manner whatsoever.

But even if you accept that consciousness is something that comes from the brain (and not quite everyone does), and you find a pattern of brain activity that correlates with a conscious experience, there is still a problem. Why should the activity of a mass of neurons feel like anything? Why does pricking your finger feel like pain? Why does a red rose appear red? 41 New Scientist magazine

Fossils reveal a natural history that is totally at odds with Darwin’s theory. Excavations have unearthed not a single example of an intermediate form, but many specimens of living fossils indistinguishable from members of the same species living today.

Darwinists claim that the brain came into being by chance, yet it functions hundreds of times faster, in a much more complex manner than the fastest computer, and its functioning cannot be replicated electronically.

Darwinists never realize that the attributes that make human beings human, such as emotion, thought, feeling, love and belief, are not the results of activity in the brain's neurons, and there can be no material explanation for them.

Darwinists never realize that the human soul is what rejoices, gets surprised, thinks, analyses, diagnoses, recognizes the sounds it hears, and delights in the image and perfume of a rose.

Darwinists never realize that materialism is invalidated in the light of the human soul, of whose existence there is full evidence, and evolution can never account for the existence of that soul.

Darwinists never realize that concepts such as love, loyalty, friendship and honesty can never be explained in materialistic terms, and that the fictitious mechanisms of evolution can bring no light to bear on them.

A coding system always entails a nonmaterial intellectual process. Physical matter cannot produce an information code. All experiences show that every piece of creative information represents some mental effort and can be traced to a personal idea-giver who exercised his own free will, and who is endowed with an intelligent mind. . . . No known law of nature, no known process and no known sequence of events can cause information to originate by itself in matter. . . . 42 Prof. Werner Gitt, director of the German Physics and Technology Institute

Darwinistler için mutasyonlar, mucizeler gerçekleştiren bir sahte ilahtır. Oysa mutasyonların zarar verici özelliğini belgeleyen sayısız örnek karşısında geliştirici özelliklerine dair elde edilmiş tek bir bulgu yoktur.

Darwinists never realize that because coincidences have no consciousness, they cannot create art and beauty, nor intelligent and conscious human beings who hear, see, smell and touch, and who understand beauty, art and science.

Darwinists never realize that the way that the colorful images forming through electrical signals in the brain, in complete darkness, is a miracle that cannot be explained in terms of coincidences.

Given the structure of the brain, Darwinists never realize how and where a function such as memory emerges when expected and required.

Darwinists never understand how it is that, while they sleep, they can dream of a sky radiant with the brightness of the Sun's rays. They can feel chilled and dampened by rain, smell the enchanting fragrance of a rose and eat the most delicious foods they can never have enough of—all inside of a 1,300 to 1,400 nerve node inside the darkness of the brain.

[T]he information contained in the genetic code, like all information or messages, is not made of matter. . . . The meaning is not a property of the arrangement of the symbols or alphabet of the code. The message or meaning in the genetic code is non-material and cannot be reduced to a physical or chemical property. 43 Dean Overman

Darwinists Never Admit that All Their Claims Over the Last 160 Years Are Invalid

But just in proportion as this process of extermination has acted on an enormous scale, so must the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed, be truly enormous. Why, then, is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against my theory. 44 Charles Darwin

Yıllarca evrime delil olarak sunulmaya çalışılan sanayi devrimi kelebeklerinin bir Darwinist saptırmacadan, Darwinist propagandadan başka bir şey olmadclığı anlaşılmıştır.

Darwinists never consider that not one single intermediate-form fossil exists to corroborate their theory of evolution.

Darwinists never consider how a large part of the Earth's rock strata has been examined and that, despite all the fossils unearthed and progress in the science of palaeontology, evolutionists still have not found one example that they can submit as evidence.

Darwinists never admit that comparing fossils millions of years old with living specimens once again reveals the invalidity of the theory of evolution.

Darwinists never admit that every piece of research they perform in order to support the theory of evolution ends in disappointment. Every discovery they make reveals more proofs refuting evolution. With life as shown in the fossil record remaining unchanged for millions of years, and with the facts shown by science, it becomes clear that Allah has created the universe and all living things.

Darwinists imagine that so-called "living fossils" prove that a process of evolution took place on Earth, but in fact, these fossils reveal a natural history that is the exact opposite of Darwin's theory. They prove that living species did not emerge gradually from a process of evolution, but were created with their flawless forms in a single moment.

The Cambrian Explosion has attracted the interest of scientists since Darwin (1859) wrote that "the sudden manner in which several groups of species first appear in our European formations—[and] the almost entire absence, as at present known, of formations rich in fossils beneath Cambrian strata—are undoubtedly of the most serious nature." 45 Richard Ellis, evolutionist marine biologist

Darwinists never realize that far from proving their own claims, the fossils of complex invertebrates such as snails, trilobites, sponges, sea urchins, crustaceans and sea lilies in Cambrian rock beds prove that living things appeared suddenly and with no forebears before them, and that they demolish the myth of Darwin's evolutionary tree.

There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways, it has become almost unmanageably rich, and discovery is outpacing integration. . . . The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps. 46 T. Neville George, professor of Paleontology

Darwinists never realize that these words, "This follows from the extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including man, with his capacity of looking far backward and far into futurity, as the result of blind chance or necessity." actually belong to Charles Darwin. 47

Archaeopteryx bir ara form değil, uçucu bir kuştur. Darwinistler, evrime delil olarak gösterilmeye çalışılan 150 milyon yıllık bu kuşun, iddialarının tam aksine evrimi yalanladığını düşünmezler.

Darwinists claim that there are functionless vestigial organs in the human body and those of other living things, but never realize that such organs are a misinterpretation that arose from the medical ignorance in the past. These organs, regarded as vestigial by Darwin and his followers, actually have very important functions.

Darwinists even maintained that a large part of DNA was functionless junk. Yet they never admit that these past claims too stemmed from scientific ignorance. With advances in genetics, the functions of these genes have been revealed.

Darwinists imagine that variations within living species, such as the different beak structures among the finches living on the Galapagos Islands, is powerful evidence for evolution. Yet they never realize that changes on the micro level, such as the differences between finches' beaks, can never produce new biological information such as new organs, and that these are therefore no proof of evolution.

Darwinists never realize that all the mutations carried out in experiments on fruit flies have produced only sickly and deformed specimens. No useful or advantageous mutation has ever been observed. Nor can new species ever be produced through mutations under the control of scientists. Rather than providing evidence for evolution, all this is further proof that evolution never took place.

Were you told that there was fierce competition among animals? Have you always watched scenes of bloody fighting accompanied by rousing music in documentaries? Were you taught how it is "natural" for the strong to crush the weak? Were you even shamelessly told that since that is a law of nature, it applies to human beings, too? The fact is that within-species fighting among animals very seldom ends in death. It is generally limited; for example, if the antlers of two stags were to become entwined, they might both starve to death . . . . Other forms of combat are also generally for show and usually short-lived. When one participant realizes it cannot defeat the other, it withdraws. The victor may feel a certain pride for a time, but does not vaunt it for a whole lifetime, and when it calms down, it returns to its lair or to the mate for whose sake it became involved in fighting in the first place. 48 A. Murat Aytekin, evolutionist biologist

Yaklaşık 530 milyon yıllık Kambriyen patlaması, Darwinistlerin tüm iddialarını yalanlamaktadır.

Darwinists never realize the fact that some fossils that they portray as ancestors of the horse are actually far younger than it. There cannot have been any transition of the kind claimed by evolutionists, and that the scientific claims regarding the horse's evolution are a complete deception.

Darwinists never discuss the evolutionist scientist Ernst Haeckel, who claimed that the forms of human fetuses in the womb undergo the supposed evolutionary process as other living things—that the human embryo has gills that subsequently disappear. But Haeckel resorted to fraud in his illustrations, sought to depict embryos as similar to one another by altering his drawings of them. His claims have been dismissed as a scientific hoax.

Darwinists claim that human beings and apes are descended from a common ancestor and that there exist fossil remains and traces of supposed ape-men. They never realize that all the fossils supposedly representing human ancestors either belong to an extinct species of ape or else to different human races.

Darwinists imagine that Great Britain's well-known Industrial Revolution moths are evidence of evolution by way of natural selection. Yet they never realize that once this tale was proved to be a scientific fraud, yet another of evolutionists' supposed proofs lost all credibility.

The central problem resolves around the adaptive value or not of intermediate stages. For natural selection to work, intermediate steps have to confer greater reproductive success. Hence, it is legitimate to ask, in a model of selection acting alone, what use is half a wing? 49 Gabriel Dover, evolutionist professor of Genetics

In claiming that the different organs in living species emerged gradually, Darwinists maintain that, for example, a reptile's legs gradually evolved into wings. Yet they never realize that a limb that is half-foreleg and half-wing will serve no purpose at all. A creature with such limbs could not survive, and that therefore, such a species would die out before it could develop any further.

The central problem resolves around the adaptive value or not of intermediate stages. For natural selection to work, intermediate steps must confer greater reproductive success. Hence, it is legitimate to ask, in a model of selection acting alone, what use is a half-developed wing?

Darwinists never consider how outdated the theory of evolution is, having first been proposed in the technological environment of the mid-1800s.

In claiming that species evolved from one another, Darwinists never realize that the fossil record has never produced a single piece of evidence to confirm this.

In claiming that living species increased in number by evolving from one another over long periods of time, Darwinists never realize that all the known phyla,—including several others that since became extinct—emerged suddenly and at the same time in the Cambrian period, before which only the single-celled organisms existed.

Darwinists never admit that once the famous fossil Archaeopteryx was recognized as a true bird and that there was no reptile able to be proposed as its ancestor, they were left with no evidence to support their claim that birds evolved from reptiles.

Darwinian evolution works by the indirect and inefficient mechanism of natural selection. 50 Stephen Jay Gould, evolutionist paleontologist and author

Darwinists never admit that the fossil record proves that living things have remained unchanged for millions of years.

Darwinists never realize that the theory of evolution, a fictitious hypothesis put forward under the 19th century's primitive understanding of biology, has never been confirmed by any scientific findings or experiments.

In claiming that Archaeopteryx is a missing link between reptiles and birds, Darwinists never realize that Archaeopteryx was a bird in every way.

In suggesting that Archaeopteryx was a partly evolved bird, Darwinists never realize that birds were alive in the same period, and even earlier.

Darwinists never admit that the Cambrian Period definitively demolishes the concept of gradual, chance development over a long period of time, which is the fundamental claim of the theory of evolution.

Since Darwinists deny the existence of Allah and creation, they never recognize that the way that the Earth was filled with a great many living things with different bodily structures and complex organs, all at the same time, is proof that these organisms were created.

Darwinists can never answer the question of how the flawless structure of wings emerged as the result of a succession of random mutations. In short, a reptile's front legs can never turn into wings as the result of some impairment or mutation arising in its genes.

Darwinists never consider that the Cambrian Period demolishes the idea of "gradual, stage by stage, chance development over long periods of time"—the fundamental claim of the theory of evolution—along with the concept of punctuated evolution.

That individual kinds of fossils remain recognizably the same, throughout the length of their occurrence in the fossil record, had been known to paleontologists long before Darwin published his Origin. Darwin himself . . . prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search. . . . One hundred and twenty years of paleontological research later, it has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin's predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction is wrong. 51 Niles Eldredge, a palaeontologist of the American Museum of Natural History, and the anthropologist Ian Tattersall

Darwinists never understand that the variety of living plant species, each with utterly perfect systems, that appeared suddenly in fossils from the Carboniferous period, 360 million years ago, again places evolutionists in an insuperable predicament. A wide variety of fossil plants from this period are little different from plant species living today.

In claiming that a fish that emerged from the sea evolved into a reptile, through an evolutionary process that lasted millions of years, Darwinists never recognize that a fish cannot survive on dry land for more than a few minutes before dying.

Darwin himself wondered, "First, why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?"52 But Darwinists never consider why, some 160 years later, not a single intermediate form has ever been found.

Darwinists never realize that the inconsistencies set out by Charles Darwin around 160 years ago in the chapter "Difficulties on Theory" in his Origin of Species still apply today, and that those inconsistencies have even increased with the advances in biology.

Darwinists never realize that no new species can result by way of natural selection, only fitter members of the same species.

Darwinists never realize that no new species can be produced by way of mutations either.

Unfortunately, large numbers of well-trained scientists whose disciplines lie outside of evolutionary biology and paleontology have gotten the idea that the fossil record is far more Darwinian than it is. This probably arises from the oversimplification inevitable in secondary sources: low-level textbooks, semi-popular articles, and the like. Also, some wishful thinking is probably involved. In the years after Darwin died, his advocates hoped to find the progressions he had predicted. These have not been found—yet the optimism has died hard, and some pure fantasy has crept into textbooks. 53 Science magazine

Darwinists never realize that it is impossible for the reptile's lung, with its two-way passage of air, to evolve into a bird's lung with its one-directional flow, because there can be no intermediate model between the two. Such an intermediate vertebrate whose lungs do not function fully could not breathe, and would survive for longer than a few minutes.

In claiming that the reptilian jaw and ear gradually turned into the mammal jaw and ear, Darwinists never realize that there is no answer to how this came about. In particular, it is impossible for an ear with a single bone to turn into one consisting of three bones, and for the sense of hearing to be preserved during the transition.

Darwinists never realize that the variations they have regarded for half a century or so as evidence of evolution have in fact nothing to do with the origin of species. For instance, though different breeds of cattle can be obtained by different genetic combinations over a period of years, cattle will never develop into another species, such as giraffes or elephants.

Darwinists never realize that "homology" is a superficial hypothesis based solely upon external appearances. It has not been confirmed by any concrete findings ever since Darwin's day. No fossils of the imaginary ancestors of living things with homologous structures that evolutionists claim must have existed have ever been encountered in any strata on Earth.