Conclusion

Charles Darwin

IMAGINARY
MUSEUMS

Darwinism is a dogmatic belief, a superstitious faith. This is the reason why evidence opposed to the theory of evolution is constantly being brought up through countless proofs, Atlas of Creation series, fossil exhibitions and detailed descriptions of individual fossils are provided to show that life forms never changed: to be a means whereby some people who have lost the ability to think objectively under the spell of a superstitious religion can see the truth.

For the last 150 years or so, the theory of evolution has been kept alive through speculation and propaganda. People are constantly subjected to subconscious indoctrination. Although evolution is based on no scientific evidence at all, it is still taught in schools, exhibited in museums with imaginative reconstructions and is the subject of frequent reports in the press. The true source of this effective indoctrination is not science, but rather a false belief system. The religion of Darwinism has convinced people of an untruth and has depicted a lie as true science.

But a falsehood without supporters cannot survive long. The theory of evolution is losing its adherents, one by one. People who learn the true nature of Darwinism can clearly see the illogicality of defending it and therefore, reject the theory. Evolutionary scientists who see the emergence of countless unchanged living fossils realize that they have dedicated their lives to a lie, and suffer due regret.

All who remain are a few admirers of Darwin, and all they can do is to recite the same old scenarios. Willingly or not, they too have recognized the defeat of Darwinism. They are unable to find anyone to address their conferences and suffer the shame of that fact whenever Darwinism is defended.

That shame can only grow, because fossils constantly produce enough evidence to demolish Darwinism, showing that living things never evolved, and were created exactly as they are today. The truth revealed by fossils cannot be concealed or ignored. The religion that is Darwinism has come to an end.

They [the angels] said, “Glory be to You! We have no knowledge except what You have taught us. You are the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.” (Surat al-Baqara, 32)

EXAMPLES OF THE EVOLUTIONIST PROPAGANDA THAT HAS DECEIVED THE WORLD FOR 160 YEARS

Speculation, slogans incompatible with the truth, and imaginary reconstructions are Darwinism’s main propaganda tools. By these means, the public is constantly indoctrinated with the idea that the theory of evolution is a scientific. In fact, however, evolution cannot explain how even the first living cell came into being. Evolutionists have no answer as to why there is not a single intermediate form fossil to support the theory—or why, if evolution really took place, living things remained unchanged for tens of millions of years, or how and when unconscious atoms originally decided to see, hear, touch feel and think. The claims of the theory of evolution are illogical; even a primary-school student would find them ridiculous. Increasingly large numbers of people are aware that this irrational propaganda, produced with media backing, is totally worthless.

EUROPE IS WAKING UP, AND DARWINISM IS BEING CONSIGNED TO THE DUSTBIN OF HISTORY

With the arrival of Adnan Oktar’s Atlas of Creation, Europe’s materialists and Darwinists were seized by serious panic. Many stated that Atlas of Creation, which was unlike any anti-evolution work they had ever seen before, represented more of a threat to their ideas than all the other books opposing Darwinism that had appeared so far. They even attempted to have the book banned.

The Atlas of Creation revealed with full supporting evidence that there was no scientific basis to the theory of evolution. It elicited a huge reaction in a large number of countries, such as Holland, Belgium, Great Britain, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain and Denmark. The impact of Atlas of Creation was made clear in countless press reports, articles by commentators, television programs and websites.

With Atlas of Creation, a genuine awakening has begun. The European public, long subjected to Darwinist and materialist indoctrination, have begun to see that the theory of evolution is of no scientific worth, being kept alive solely for ideological reasons. Surveys in different countries have revealed a significant fall in the numbers of people who believe in Darwinism.

For instance, one poll conducted by the French journal Science Actualités revealed that 92% of people did not believe that human beings came into existence by way of evolution, while a mere 5% believed in evolution. In another survey by the famous German daily Süddedeutsche Zeitung, the level of people believing that Man is the work of a Creator was 85%, while only 9% believed that the theory of evolution is true. One survey which made this change of opinion crystal-clear appeared in Blick, published in Switzerland: A full 85% of respondents believed in Creation, while only 8% believed in the theory of evolution.

This awakening led to serious unease among European materialist circles. Aware that the supposed scientific basis for their ideology was collapsing, they began what they thought was a series of precautionary measures. One of these was the “Dangers of Creationism in Education” report prepared by the Council of the European Parliament Culture, Science and Education Committee.

The report consisting of 104 articles, requested that the 47 member countries take action against Creationist thinking and claimed that Europe was facing a major threat. “We are witnessing a growth of modes of thought which, the better to impose religious dogma, [Surely religion is beyond this] are attacking the very core of the knowledge that we have patiently built up on nature, evolution, our origins and our place in the universe.” This extract from the report set out the real reason for this concern: that Darwinism is being kept alive because of the supposed scientific support it gives to materialism. The collapse of Darwinism means materialism and atheism are deprived of one of their most important props. Indeed, the report stated that the teaching of Creation rocked the world view, in other words materialism, that had been “patiently built up.” Article 12 of the report referred to Adnan Oktar’s anti-Darwinist activities and to the impact of his Atlas of Creation in Europe, saying that no other work to date had had such a major effect.

Article 57 read:

The Harun Yahya offensive: In early 2007, the Turkish creationist Harun Yahya sent his work entitled The Atlas of Creation to a very large number of French schools and resource centers . . . He [Hervé LeGuyader] considers the book to be “Much more dangerous than the previous creationist initiatives, which were often of Anglo-Saxon origin.” He believes that . . . the method employed by the author could “PROVE HIGHLY EFFECTIVE in the case of an uninformed public . . . .”

The report ended with the words, “If we are not careful, the values that are the very essence of the Council of Europe will be in danger of being directly threatened by the Creationist fundamentalists. It is part of the role of the Council’s parliamentarians to react before it is too late.” The report’s main aim was to ban the teaching of the fact of Creation. This demand—a violation of democracy, fundamental human rights and intellectual freedom—shed light on an important truth: European materialists are in a state of complete panic. Circles keen to maintain the materialist domination of science are unable to defend Darwinism in intellectual terms.

In fact, however, prohibiting ideas does no good: Ideas must be opposed by other ideas. In any climate in which ideas of all kinds can be freely expressed, reason, good conscience and common sense will prevail. And the reality to which reason, good conscience and common sense all point is Creation.

THE RENOWNED PHILOSOPHER ANTHONY FLEW DECLARED THAT SCIENCE POINTS TO CREATION

As people have certainly been influenced by me, I want to try and correct the enormous damage I may have done. —Anthony Flew

Anthony Flew, one of the best-known atheist philosophers of his day, admitted that the atheism he had espoused for the previous 66 years was a philosophy that had collapsed in the face of the complex structure in DNA. The 81-year-old British professor became an atheist at the age of 15 and first made his name in the academic field with an article published in 1950. Over the next 54 years, he espoused atheism at the universities of Oxford, Aberdeen, Keele and Reading, where he taught, at a large number of U.S. and Canadian universities he visited, and in debates, books, lectures and articles.

Not long ago, however, Flew renounced his error and admitted that the universe was created. In a report carried by The Sunday Times, he said:

“I have been persuaded that it is simply out of the question that the first living matter evolved out of dead matter and then developed into an extraordinarily complicated creature.” (Stuart Wavell, Will Iredale, “Sorry, says atheistinchief, I do believe in God after all,” The Sunday Times, 12 December 2004; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1400368,00.html)

A single consciousness, a universal wisdom, pervades the universe. The discoveries of science, those that search the quantum nature of subatomic matter, have moved us to the brink of a startling realization: all existence is the expression of this wisdom. In the laboratories we experience it as information that first physically articulated as energy and then condensed into the form of matter. Every particle, every being, from atom to human, appears to represent a level of information, of wisdom. (Gerald Schroeder, The Hidden Face of God, New York: Touchstone, 2001, p. XI.)

THE DIRECTOR OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT DESCRIBES HIS FAITH IN ALLAH (GOD)

The well-known scientist Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, had been an atheist since the age of 27.

Francis Collins

But in later years, Collins would see the “stupendous information” contained in DNA and turned into a believer, describing why he believed in his book The Language of God. The book states that there is a logical basis for the existence of a Creator and that scientific discoveries “draw man closer to God.”
An article in the 11 June, 2006, edition of the Sunday Times, headed “I’ve Found God, Says Man Who Cracked the Genome,” read:

One of the great tragedies of our time is this impression that has been created that science and religion have to be at war. I don’t see that as necessary at all and I think it is deeply disappointing that the shrill voices that occupy the extremes of this spectrum have dominated the stage for the past 20 years. When you make a breakthrough it is a moment of scientific exhilaration because you have been on this search and seem to have found it. But it is also a moment where I at least feel closeness to the Creator in the sense of having now perceived something that no human knew before but God knew all along. When you have for the first time in front of you this 3.1 billion-letter instruction book that conveys all kinds of information and all kinds of mystery about humankind, you can’t survey that going through page after page without a sense of awe. I can’t help but look at those pages and have a vague sense that this is giving me a glimpse of God’s mind.

WORKS

CATEGORIES

Conclusion