Albert Einstein once said:
“The scientists’ religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.” (Albert Einstein, The World as I See It, Secaucus, New Jersy: The Citadel Press, 1999, pp. 24-29)
The Owner of this awe-inspiring intelligence is God.
We don’t actually need to hear it from a scientist to understand this fact. Our own intelligence is enough to show us the existence of a Creator because we all have the capability of assessing what we see and come to a conclusion.
Everywhere we look, we see an incredible order; from the perfect mechanisms of millions of different species to the endless variety of vegetables and fruits, from the delicate balances on our planet to the precise levels of oxygen in the air. Knowing and seeing all of this is enough to make us clearly realize the existence of God, Who has infinite wisdom. Needless to say, science and technology, which advance at a mind-boggling rate, are our biggest helpers in this understanding.
With the advance of technology, scientists are able to make much better and more accurate observations. For instance, the Hubble Telescope proved that the universe had a beginning and was created. With the advance of technology and the onset of advanced scanning electron microscopes, we were able to examine the tiniest details of the living cell, including the DNA, and there we encountered an incredible complexity that has absolutely no room for coincidences. This was such a precise order that the scientists leading the Human Genome Project, one of the most significant scientific researches in recent years, have clearly stated that the structure in the DNA and its perfect order unquestionably pointed to the existence of a superior intelligence.
Gene Myers, who was a part of the team in charge of the Human Genome Project, said the following about the order he saw in the DNA:
What really astounds me is the architecture of life… The system is extremely complex. It's like it was designed… There's a huge intelligence there. (Tom Abate, “Human Genome Project”, San Francisco Chronicle, February 19, 2001)
One of the most important evidences of Creation is, no doubt, the fossil record. All of the 700 million fossils unearthed so far are identical to their living counterparts. This means that living things haven’t changed at all; in other words, they haven’t evolved. Just as we see in the shark fossil that is dated millions of years.
All scientific findings point us in direction of Creation. Despite this, majority of people are unaware of these facts. It is because world of science is under immense pressure to keep facts away from public eye and to this end, scientific facts are either hidden or distorted. This is the ideological pressure of materialism and economic pressure of capitalism that provides ideological support to materialism. Platforms where scientists are supposed to present their views to propel their careers are under control of those pressure circles.
The proponents of the superstitious religion of Darwinism are so adamant and tyrannical in this that speaking against evolution brings with it a great deal of difficulties for the relevant person. According to this Darwinist imposition, doubting evolution, or talking about Darwinist hoaxes, is tantamount to committing a crime. In addition, saying that evolution is a theory that has yet to be proven is another major crime for them. It is almost impossible for a scientist with an anti-Darwinist stance to lecture in the biology department of a university. It is impossible to see any picture of a fossil that refutes the evolutionary theory on the pages of a pro-Darwinist newspaper. It is considered a mistake for a biology teacher to express his doubts about the theory of evolution, and when that happens, that teacher will most probably be dismissed.
95-million-year old fossil horn shark is identical to its living counterpart and shows no change. |
The examples of this oppression are abundant: For instance, biology professor Caroline Crocker; she was dismissed from George Mason University because she questioned evolutionary theory. This is how she describes her ordeal:
My supervisor called me to his office and said ‘You have to be disciplined for teaching creation’, and I lost my job at the end of that semester. (Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, Dir. Nathan Francowski, 2008)
Biologist Richard von Sternberg, Ph.D., was dismissed from his duty at the National History Museum because he questioned evolution and allowed the publication of anti-evolution authors. There is only one reason for these discriminatory attitudes. Universities, scientific publications and similar institutions and organizations are under the control of those that support materialistic worldviews. They want the theory of evolution –which is trying to rationalize fairy tales of coincidences - to be supported and propagated. There is no room for anyone in their world if that someone has conflicting views. Such people are removed from their duties at universities. Their articles are no longer published in journals. These circles control the educational systems of all countries and compel these countries to teach children the fairy tales of evolution as if they are facts.
Children growing up with the ruthless dogmas of evolution like ‘survival of the fittest’, or ‘the crush to survive’; they are indoctrinated with a cruel morality and a ruthless view of humanity and life. Needless to say, generations are raised with Darwinist lies that humans descend from animals and are therefore unworthy, turn problematic. Therefore, the efforts of honest scientists like yourselves, who believe in science and conscientiousness and who explain the facts will help thwart these dangers and brighten up the future. Bravely speaking about the facts is a great virtue and it is an important trait of courageous people. Truth triumphs over all wrongs and lies. Sometimes, it may take some time. Now it is that time.
There is no doubt that people, like you, like us, people who use this time wisely and to tell the facts, will win both in the eyes of people and in the sight of the Creator, Who creates those people. And by the means of them, other people will also win. They will win themselves, their lives and their eternal lives.
Before I conclude, I want to remind you of one more thing. When Darwinism is mentioned, one name immediately comes to mind, who has had great influence not only in Turkey, but all around the world. Mr. Adnan Oktar, or Harun Yahya as he is mostly known outside Turkey, who is the Honorary Chairman of our Foundation.
Many presentations and studies to be discussed in this conference are based on his works.
Mr. Adnan Oktar, the Honorary Chairman of Technics and Science Research Foundation, has written more than 300 books and most are dedicated to the rebuttal of Darwinism. He also extensively writes and speaks against the Darwinist dictatorship, and proves the connection of the theory of evolution and Social Darwinism and its detrimental effects on society. I would like to note also that he is very happy that you came to Turkey and attended our scientific event.
The "Discovery of the Transitional Forms" is a Fraud |
The absence of transitional fossils did not look like an insuperable one in Darwin's time. Darwin was amazed that not a single intermediate fossil to confirm his theory had been discovered in any of the Earth's strata, but he still believed they would be "found in the future." In the chapter titled "Difficulties on Theory" of his The Origin of Species he wrote: ... Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined? But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links?1 The lack of transitional fossils, which refuted Darwin's expectations, and not a single one of which has been discovered over the last 150 years, has demolished his theory. More than 700 million fossils have to date been unearthed. These fossils have definitively declared the crushing defeat of Darwinism. They all belong to complete and perfect life forms. A great many are specimens of life forms still living today. But not one of these 700 million is a transitional form. The lack of transitional fossils means the death of Darwinism, and is something that the adherents of the superstitious faith that is Darwinism cannot accept. For that reason, Darwinists resorted to traditional methods and began manufacturing fictitious transitional fossils. Today, when we look at publications that are Darwinist in origin we see that all the fossils depicted as transitional forms are in fact the product of fraud. This false evidence, which may sometimes be based on extinct life forms, sometimes on fictitious illustrations, sometimes on just one single fossil tooth and sometimes on skulls fraudulently manufactured in a laboratory environment, is all important proof that transitional fossils do not exist and that Darwinism is a deception. Professor of mathematics Wolfgang Smith is one of those scientists who openly admits that transitional fossils do not exist: On the fundamental level, it becomes a rigorously demonstrable fact that there are no transitional types, and the so-called missing links are indeed non-existent.2 The evolutionist paleontologist Stephen Stanley makes this comment on the absence of transitional fossils: The known fossil record fails to document a single example of phyletic evolution accomplishing a major morphology transition, and hence offers no evidence that gradualistic model can be valid.3 The University of Kansas geologist Ronald R. West comments: If evolution were true, the fossil record should have demonstrated: ◉ The oldest rocks that bear evidence of life would contain the most primitive forms of life capable of fossilization. ◉ Younger rocks would contain evidence of more complex forms of life. ◉ There would be a gradual change in life forms from simple to complex. ◉ There would be huge numbers of transitional forms. However, contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution.4 |
There are more than 380 fossil beds all over the Earth. More than 700 million fossils have been unearthed to date. All of these fossils are evidence of God’s creation. Not even a single one of these fossils is an intermediary link; they all are proofs of the Fact of Creation. |
Darwinists have been unable to put forth a single genuine intermediate form. Not a single transitional fossil has ever been unearthed. There is not a single example of a genuine transitional form on display in museums of evolution. Each one of the 700 million fossils has refuted evolution. They are all fully formed and perfect fossils of life forms, whether still living or extinct. The lack of transitional forms is such that even Darwinists cannot deny the obvious. Faced by various difficulties, they sometimes are forced to admit it. One such statement comes from the evolutionist paleontologist Colin Patterson: I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book [Evolution]. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would have certainly have included them. ... I will lay it on the line – there is not one single transitional form in the fossil record for which one could make a watertight argument.5 The absence of intermediate forms is not something that should be glossed over with sophistry, as by the majority of Darwinists, or else regarded as unimportant. No transitional forms mean no evolution. One or a few fossils are not enough to validate the theory of evolution. There would have to be millions of them. But there exists not one single transitional fossil. This reality – that just about 100% of the fossil record has been unearthed by the first decade of the 21st century, and that not one of the millions of transitional fossils that there should theoretically have been has been found – is by itself very powerful and sound evidence that evolution is a lie. Mark Ridley of the Oxford University Department of Zoology describes how all the fossil record shows that Darwinism is a lie: In any case, no real evolutionist, whether a gradualist or a punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation...6 The interesting thing is the way that, as we shall be seeing in due course – and in the face of this reality – Darwinists still try to depict fully formed, complete and perfect fossils as transitional forms, or else manufacture their own. The principal reason for their resorting to fraud is without doubt their inability to produce any scientific evidence and their desperation. The main element that makes Darwinism a fraud is that the followers of this superstitious religion have to engage in hoaxes, lies and deception. The adherents of this superstitious faith claim to be acting in the name of science, but the findings of science openly refute the theory of evolution. In Darwinists' eyes, Darwinism can only be propped up by means of countless lies. That is why their "transitional form found" propaganda that constitutes part of this is also a huge fraud. |
The Disasters Caused by Darwinist Education: Young Murderers |
A large number of students in schools have been killed in attacks using weapons on schools in Europe and the USA in recent years. The media have generally suggested that these attacks are the work of people with depression or psychopathic behavior or antisocial personality disorder. Looked at closely, however, there is another more striking factor behind these attacks; the theory of evolution, which claims that life is a struggle between weak and strong. By spreading the lie that there is no purpose to human life, Darwinist education turns people into psychologically sick individuals, pessimistic and psychopathic, devoid of all hope and joy. Darwin’s superstition that has poisoned vast numbers turns people into serial killers and even makes them psychopathic enough to eat human flesh. School massacres is one of those disasters that comes of this false religion which seeks to indoctrinate people with the idea they have no responsibility to a Creator, that convinces them they are purposeless, irresponsible and aimless entities, that regards human beings as animals and that seeks to turn people away from the fact of the hereafter by portraying death as the end. The Jokela High School MassacreIn a message posted on the YouTube web site prior to the massacre, the 18-year-old Pekka-Eric Auvinen, who slaughtered seven students and a teacher on November 1st, 2007, before killing himself, described himself as an antisocial social Darwinist and went on to say: "I am an anarchist who believes only in natural selection. People must again start applying natural selection. Animals live in that way, so why should human beings not? At the end of the day, we are simply animals. We human beings are the worst animals on Earth... That is where there must be [natural selection]. The earlier, the better. ... The weak must die, while the strong survive. That is natural selection, the survival of the fittest. Animals constantly die. You never see a dog crying over having killed another dog. Human beings also die. The reaction must be the same. This is simply a natural thing, not a great or important one. I am not the law and the judge. I have no authority. I am ready to fight and die for my aim. Since I do not regard natural selection as sufficient, I will eliminate the disgraces of mankind, the failures of natural selection... I am different, I have evolved a stage further." (From Pecca-Eric Auvinen's video "My Philosophy") The Columbine High School MassacreOn April 20th, 1999, two students at Columbine High School in the U.S. state of Colorado, 18-year-old Eric Harris and 17-year-old Dylan Klebold, entered their school with guns and bombs. After killing 12 students and a teacher in the space of 30 minutes, they then killed themselves. Harris' T-shirt read “Natural Selection.” Most of the writings collected from Harris’ home in the wake of the attack referred to natural selection and feelings of superiority. In videos previously uploaded onto the internet, Harris and Klebold constantly referred to themselves as “more evolved” and talked about how it felt to be supposedly “superhuman.” As we can see only in these examples, Darwinism can easily turn innocent people into monsters. With utmost priority, the one-sided Darwinist indoctrination should be ended in school education, and the scientific evidence against Darwinism should be a part of the school curricula. The officials who are devising educational policies should be aware of such circumstances of Darwinist education and bear the responsibility. The educational system has to be amended accordingly to provide for the acknowledgment of the youth on the scientific invalidity of Darwinism and its ideological background. |
1- Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press, 1964, p. 172, 280
2- Wolfgang Smith, Teilhardism and the New Religion, A Thorough Analysis of the Teachings of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Rockford IL, Tan Books and Publishers, Inc. 1988, p. 8 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 181
3- Stephen Stanley, Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, San Francisco CA, W. H. Freeman, 1979, p. 39 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 153
4- Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 153
5- Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 152
6- Mark Ridley, "Who Doubts Evolution?", New Scientist, vol. 90, 1981, p. 831 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 152