Darwinists have recently been exhibiting a state of great awe. They believe that foreign journals are miraculous. They literally regard these journals as sacred, and regard everything published in them as equally sacred. Since they hold such a belief they imagine that everything published in them will have a stunning impact. The way they are so impressed with all things foreign and their inferiority complex that stems from their inability to defend the theory of evolution scientifically forces them to issue such statements.

This admiration for all things foreign has reached such a dimension that proponents of evolution in Turkey in particular refuse to accept scientific evidence as such unless it is published in these journals they so admire. They oppose all kinds of scientific fact by saying, “If a paper has been published in a foreign journal it is true, and if not, it is wrong.” They still reject such papers if they are collected together in book form. In their eyes, in order for an article to be accurate and scientific it has to be published in a journal of some 50 pages measuring 27x20 cm, on wood-containing paper and lavishly illustrated with pictures of Darwin on the cover. But if the papers are collected together in book form, they will still regard them as unacceptable, no matter what scientific evidence they contain.

The fact is, however, THAT A GENUINELY SCIENTIFIC WORK IS ONE THAT PROVIDES SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. The work in question may be a CD, or a book or a magazine, so long as it contains scientific evidence. There is no need for it to be a journal published in English on wood-containing paper. Rejecting Turkish studies, solely on the grounds that they are written in Turkish and published in Turkey and persistently and openly expressing one’s blind admiration for Europe in that regard is an utterly humiliating thing for Turkish Darwinist scientists.

This admiration that Turkish Darwinists feel for Nature and other such journals originating from Europe probably stems from the fact that these and similar journals are under the protection of the Darwinist dictatorship. Darwinists are very well aware that not a single anti-Darwinist word is allowed to appear in any of these publications. Paleontologists are currently in possession of 250 million fossils that prove the fact of Creation. Yet although these are all scientific evidence, not a single one has ever appeared in any of the publications in question. They exclude this scientific evidence, because if it were to be published it would prove the fact of Creation, and that would run contrary to the interests of the Darwinist dictatorship.
 
Another point that needs to be made clear here is this: the journal Nature that Darwinists praise to the very heavens was first brought out by Thomas Henry Huxley, who called himself “Darwin’s bulldog,” a high-ranking mason and a member of the Royal Society, itself made up of masons, and charged with the task of disseminating Darwin’s theory of evolution. The greatest aim of this magazine, established entirely under the control of freemasons, is to engage in propaganda for the nonsense of Darwinism and to spread this heretical theory across the world. For that reason, it is an easy way out for Darwinists to say they only regard what is written in a Darwinist journal under masonic control as “scientific.”

 
Darwinists must now abandon their deception. They cannot stand against 250 million fossils, nor justify their position in the face of the scientific realities. That is because Darwinism is in a state of rout and defeat right across the world. And everyone knows it. Darwinists must at last abandon their awe of foreign journals and act in the light of the scientific evidence.